0001Guardian Lord ★Jul. 11, 2024 (Thu) 15:18:40.38ID:yPJJNPmx9
7/11 (Thu) 15:03
On the 11th, the Supreme Court’s First Petty Bench (Judge Toru Sakai, presiding) overturned the Tokyo High Court’s ruling in favor of the sect in a lawsuit in which the family of a former member of the World Peace Unification Family Federation (formerly the Unification Church) sought approximately 65 million yen in damages from the sect, alleging that she had become a victim of illegal solicitation to make donations. The main issues at issue were the validity of a memorandum signed by the woman stating that she would not seek compensation from the sect, and the illegality of the solicitation of donations.
It is believed that there are many cases in which documents similar to the memorandum are submitted to the sect. A trial seeking an order to disband the sect is also underway at the Tokyo District Court.
According to the first and second instance rulings, the woman, who was invited to join the sect by her relatives, donated more than 100 million yen, including the assets of her bedridden husband, while she was living in Nagano Prefecture from 2005 to 2010. In November 2015, she signed and stamped a memorandum at a notary public’s office stating that the donations were of her own volition and that she would not make any requests for the money to be returned, and submitted it to the cult. About six months after writing the memorandum, the woman was diagnosed with dementia and passed away in 2021.
>A memorandum stating that no requests for return will be made is signed and stamped at a notary public office and submitted to the cult. It’s amazing how much effort there is in case of trouble.
I wondered why they had won the case for a while >>14 I guess it was inevitable that they would win In fact, the Supreme Court that overturned the case seems to be trying to let off some steam for the public.
>>21 Netouyo’s favorite magazines, Hanada and Will, are full of defense of the Unification Church So it’s no wonder that netouyo = defense of the Unification Church
How could a donation be valid if they even used a notary public office like this? With the recent Superiority Protection Act, hasn’t the Supreme Court recently been too biased towards making decisions based on sentiment?
>>23 Instead of making him donate all his assets to the extent that it would have been difficult to live with, he should have accepted a reasonable amount.
>>31 Rather, maybe they’re trying to let off some steam out of consideration for the Unification Church of the Liberal Democratic Party so as not to further lower its approval rating?
Comments