1Mist ★.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:46:26.00ID:0C17RWWs9
Dangerous driving resulting in fatal accident at 194km/h: Defendant man says “I don’t know,” defense argues “Doesn’t qualify as high speed that is difficult to control” First hearing at Oita District Court
Is the issue “dangerous driving” or “negligent driving”?
The first hearing in a lay judge trial of a man who was 19 years old at the time and is accused of dangerous driving resulting in death for driving a car at 194km/h on a prefectural road in Oita City three years ago, crashing into an oncoming vehicle and killing a man, was held at the Oita District Court. The man said “I don’t know about such things” regarding dangerous driving, and the defense argued that dangerous driving did not exist, indicating that they will fight the charges. According to the indictment, in February 2021, a 19-year-old man (23) was driving a car at 194 km/h on a prefectural road in Ozai, Oita City, when he collided with an oncoming vehicle turning right, killing Ken Koyanagi (50 at the time). At the first hearing of the lay judge trial, which began on the 5th at the Oita District Court, when asked by the presiding judge about dangerous driving, the defendant replied, “I don’t know anything about that sort of thing.” After this, the defense indicated they would fight the case, arguing that “the driving did not constitute high speeds that were difficult to control, and there was no intent to obstruct, so dangerous driving does not exist.” In their opening statement, the prosecution said, “When driving at 194 km/h, the vehicle shakes significantly. The number of times steering and braking operations increase, and even a small mistake can lead to incorrect operation. “Driving 194 km/h at night reduces visibility and makes it difficult to notice vehicles turning right,” he said. Regarding obstruction, “forcing another person to make a sudden evacuation while driving and preventing them from driving freely and safely is also an act of obstruction. The road where the incident occurred is one where it is assumed that there will be vehicles turning right, so pedestrians are naturally aware of oncoming vehicles. “At 194 kilometres per hour, the stopping distance is 265 metres, and the driver was travelling straight at such an abnormally high speed that he could not have avoided a collision,” he said, describing the driving as dangerous. Meanwhile, the defense argued, “The steering wheel did not shake or the driver was unable to brake or anything like that. Until the actual collision, the car was able to travel straight ahead as intended without veering out of its lane. He claimed that he had no active motive to risk his own life and limb to obstruct the passage of an oncoming vehicle making a right turn. He added: “Under the law, high speed alone does not constitute dangerous driving. There is no scientific evidence that driving 194 km at night leads to impaired vision…
*The rest is omitted, please see the source for the full article. Yahoo!News
11/5 (Tue) 10:08 distribution obs Oita Broadcasting.
Is the issue “dangerous driving” or “negligent driving”?
The first hearing in a lay judge trial of a man who was 19 years old at the time and is accused of dangerous driving resulting in death for driving a car at 194km/h on a prefectural road in Oita City three years ago, crashing into an oncoming vehicle and killing a man, was held at the Oita District Court. The man said “I don’t know about such things” regarding dangerous driving, and the defense argued that dangerous driving did not exist, indicating that they will fight the charges. According to the indictment, in February 2021, a 19-year-old man (23) was driving a car at 194 km/h on a prefectural road in Ozai, Oita City, when he collided with an oncoming vehicle turning right, killing Ken Koyanagi (50 at the time). At the first hearing of the lay judge trial, which began on the 5th at the Oita District Court, when asked by the presiding judge about dangerous driving, the defendant replied, “I don’t know anything about that sort of thing.” After this, the defense indicated they would fight the case, arguing that “the driving did not constitute high speeds that were difficult to control, and there was no intent to obstruct, so dangerous driving does not exist.” In their opening statement, the prosecution said, “When driving at 194 km/h, the vehicle shakes significantly. The number of times steering and braking operations increase, and even a small mistake can lead to incorrect operation. “Driving 194 km/h at night reduces visibility and makes it difficult to notice vehicles turning right,” he said. Regarding obstruction, “forcing another person to make a sudden evacuation while driving and preventing them from driving freely and safely is also an act of obstruction. The road where the incident occurred is one where it is assumed that there will be vehicles turning right, so pedestrians are naturally aware of oncoming vehicles. “At 194 kilometres per hour, the stopping distance is 265 metres, and the driver was travelling straight at such an abnormally high speed that he could not have avoided a collision,” he said, describing the driving as dangerous. Meanwhile, the defense argued, “The steering wheel did not shake or the driver was unable to brake or anything like that. Until the actual collision, the car was able to travel straight ahead as intended without veering out of its lane. He claimed that he had no active motive to risk his own life and limb to obstruct the passage of an oncoming vehicle making a right turn. He added: “Under the law, high speed alone does not constitute dangerous driving. There is no scientific evidence that driving 194 km at night leads to impaired vision…
*The rest is omitted, please see the source for the full article. Yahoo!News
11/5 (Tue) 10:08 distribution obs Oita Broadcasting.
時速194キロ死亡事故 危険運転、被告の男「わかりません」 弁護側「制御困難な高速度に該当せず」と主張 大分地裁初公判(OBS大分放送) - Yahoo!ニュース
大分市の県道で3年前、時速194キロで車を運転し、対向車に衝突して男性を死亡させたとして危険運転致死罪に問われている当時19歳の男の裁判員裁判初公判が大分地裁で開かれ、危険運転について男は「そのよう
15Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:52:04.29ID:+xFT0EhR0
>>1
Apparently, judges won’t understand unless they make someone experience 194km/h, including the impact lol
The law and society are at odds.
Apparently, judges won’t understand unless they make someone experience 194km/h, including the impact lol
The law and society are at odds.
5Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:49:48.41ID:SkiNIdwy0
I want to punish this lawyer too.
6Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:50:00.73ID:VgT8e+Z80
> A man who was 19 years old at the time (23)
🤔
🤔
7Security Guard [lv.25].Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:50:02.73ID:93CWZkPs0
I understand that lawyers say this because it’s their job, but I’d like to know what you think as an individual.
8Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:50:11.04ID:b0vl7BE70
With a stopping distance of 265 metres, you’ll end up going all the way to the next intersection.
9Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:50:50.16ID:IUuGOQOd0
194km is amazing. I’ve never done it on the highway. I must be crazy.
10Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:51:03.14ID:lnN9uPTY0
I guess they don’t have any human hearts.
11Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:51:11.06ID:leNoOROe0
It’s difficult to control, which is why it’s causing serious accidents.
13Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:51:52.45ID:hg6o7YLn0
The accident occurred not because of difficulty in controlling the vehicle, but because it was controlled as intended.
16Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:52:09.09ID:Qm4wB4vK0
I would also like to know the name of the lawyer.
17Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:52:21.43ID:4mRguYW10
If 194km/h is not considered dangerous driving, then how many km/h does it become dangerous?
18Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:52:47.77ID:0OGIlxhq0
> Defense: “Does not qualify as high speed that is difficult to control”
Lawyer not motivated.
Lawyer not motivated.
20Hunter [lv.245][Seedling].Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:53:00.46ID:UNjFYXyo0
It may be difficult to control when an accident occurs.
21Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:53:24.27ID:L2v00bbb0
I was speeding but I was going straight. Cars turning right should go straight and then turn right.
22Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:53:28.80ID:jGsMuOUl0
Let’s have the lawyer drive 200km from Aomori to Kagoshima. It will take about 10 hours to get there.
23Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:53:40.94ID:EEdZIomD0
This lawyer deserves to go to hell.
24Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:54:01.03ID:Xl2Qg8jG0
Dangerous driving resulting in death or injury is a crime that applies when someone is killed or injured through dangerous driving of a motor vehicle. High application.
25Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:54:14.74ID:p7mha8fD0
Driving 194km on a prefectural road is obviously dangerous driving, you idiot. This lawyer is also a lunatic, fire him.
26Security Guard [lv.5] [Sprout].Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:54:24.12ID:pibXoJck0
The reason you can’t brake in time is because you can’t control it.
27Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:54:24.63ID:0OGIlxhq0
If it is controllable and an accident occurs, it is murder.
28Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:54:40.95ID:L2v00bbb0
It was going fast but it was going straight. The car turning right should have turned right after that car.
29Security Guard [lv.25].Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:54:42.66ID:M1iu0u7A0
If it could be controlled, the accident would not have happened.
30Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:54:59.72ID:ZN1GoFON0
I want to quit being a lawyer, but I feel like it’s a burden on my family.
31Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:55:34.81ID:LLOuYvzY0
A talented person who could take over from Lawyer Doraemon.
32Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:55:46.73ID:Qm4wB4vK0
I think that fatal accidents occurring when driving at 1.5 times the speed limit should be automatically charged with dangerous driving, but I think it would be fine if a judge could set a precedent, like with the death penalty.
33Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:55:55.10ID:PhCcifp00
If he’s in his early twenties and driving a car that can do 200km/h, he must be the son of a rich rich guy. The trial and sentence will be lenient.
34Security guard [lv.5].Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:55:57.96ID:827OG+kb0
194km is amazing. Driving slowly and obeying the speed limit is peaceful.
35Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:56:06.93ID:L2v00bbb0
“Out of control” means he was trying to avoid a car that was trying to turn right and was running into him. He was going fast but going straight. And the car is very powerful.
36Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:56:08.40ID:9ZCUW+2/0
Well, the law allows the sale of cars that can go up to 180km on public roads, so it doesn’t make sense to judge dangerous driving based on speed alone.
37Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:56:12.84ID:hg6o7YLn0
Backing up the wrong way on a one-way street is considered dangerous driving even at 16km/h, so I guess it’s not a speed issue.
38Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:56:14.77ID:r8LwxXOR0
> Until the actual collision, the car was able to travel straight without straying from its lane as intended. Shinjiro never caused an accident until he had one.
39Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:56:36.87ID:ZN1GoFON0
“So why didn’t you control it?”
40Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:56:49.72ID:Xl2Qg8jG0
I thought it was a highway, but it’s actually a prefectural road.
41Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:57:02.77ID:Z2BzfjEh0
It’s not a highway, it’s a regular road.
42Anonymous Donburako.Nov. 5, 2024 (Tue) 15:57:05.08ID:vL0FXXmW0
Revoke this lawyer’s license.
Comments