Representative Naoki Hyakuta’s “human rights ignorance proposal” in favour of “hysterectomy for women over 30” has drawn criticism， with people calling it “quite shocking” and “frightening．”
The Japan Conservative Party won three seats in the recent House of Representatives election, bringing its total vote share in all 11 proportional representation blocks to 2% as stipulated by the Public Offices Election Act, making it a national political party. Comments made by the party’s leader, author Naoki Hyakuta, are causing controversy online. On November 8th, during the YouTube live broadcast program “Asa 8,” journalist Kaori Arimoto, Secretary General of the Japanese Conservative Party, and Hyakuta spoke about Japan’s measures to combat the declining birthrate and aging population. After discussing how women’s advancement into the workplace is one of the causes of the declining birthrate, Arimoto said, “I think we should teach children that there is a time limit to having children,” to which Hyakuta suggested, “Then, once you turn 30, you should have a hysterectomy.” Arimoto frantically stopped him, saying, “Stop it,” to which Hyakuta replied, “No, this is science fiction,” as if it were a joke. Furthermore, on the same program, Momota also suggested that “women should not be allowed to go to university after the age of 18” and that “laws should be enacted that if you are single over the age of 25, you cannot marry for the rest of your life.” Although he prefaced his post by saying, “Isn’t this a good thing?”, he spoke of “measures to combat the declining birthrate” that seemed to ignore human rights.” (Political reporter) This has caused strong opposition on X. “Women are only worth getting married and having children? If so, that’s pretty bad.” “This is something that shouldn’t be said even as an analogy.” “I wonder how someone can make such a sexist statement.” “What will happen to those who want to have children but can’t?” “The Japanese Conservative Party is a scary group of ideologists.” “The gist of the argument seems to be that unless radical policies are adopted, Japan’s trend toward later marriages and declining birth rates cannot be stopped, but even if it is used as an analogy, it seems to be criticized online for being too far-fetched. Momota, who has written books such as “Eien no Zero,” which is about kamikaze pilots, has garnered support from conservative voters with his radical statements, but his latest comments have led to some voices saying they will “withdraw their support.” Up until now, whatever statements were made may have been dismissed as the words of just one writer, but following this election, the Japan Conservative Party has become a national political party. National political parties are organizations that are eligible to receive political party subsidies, which are funded by taxes. As its representative, Mr. Momota bears great responsibility as a public figure. Can such extreme discriminatory remarks really be excused using the excuse that it is “science fiction”? “This is clearly crossing the line,” said a political reporter. What kind of measures to combat the declining birthrate are they planning to propose in the Diet? [flash] 2024/11/9 (Sat) 18:55 ★1 2024/11/09 (Sat) 21:13:04.71 ※Previous thread.
I hate censorship, but please be aware that your message will be broadcast to the whole world lol. You are the “Japanese Conservative Party” after all.
The situation became chaotic as followers even pressed Ishihara, who had cut him down with sound reason, demanding that he be punished for taking his words out of context.
Even if you’re 40 and you’re talking about having a hysterectomy, you’re still calling her a lolicon at 30 and saying her thoughts are from the Edo period.
It reminds me of the old Eugenic Protection Law. Well, I think they’re really extreme and dangerous, based on their interactions in Shin-Osaka during the election.
>>14 But it’s true that the Eugenics Protection Law is being reevaluated again. Diversity: If we give preferential treatment to unproductive people, the country will perish.
If they don’t say both men and women, it will lead to discrimination. Even if they do, it’s a dystopia. I want a novel to be written with this setting.
Japan’s three biggest crazy political parties: Reiwa has many supporters who are unemployed and NEETs; loves political party conspiracy theories; supported by conservative, low-educated netouyos (the support base is probably the same as Reiwa lol).
But I want everyone to think seriously and honestly from the bottom of their hearts, without any political correctness or hypocrisy, and this is the truth no matter how you look at it.
>>28 Instead of trying to make the world a happy place where everyone can get married and have children, why do we tend to go in the direction of restricting other people’s human rights like this? I guess there are some people who like to see others persecuted and suffering.
It’s a hypothetical story, but it’s been cut out and idiots are making a fuss about it. It’s an analogy, so I’m using the extreme example of a 30-year-old, but if it was 40 or 50, it would make sense.
Is it a statement or an excerpt from an essay? Attacking someone by assuming it’s a convenient part without showing the original source is a typical leftist tactic.
>>59 I watched the 494th episode at 8am, and they were right on the money, Hyakuta is out, and the topic of declining birth rates starts at about 1 hour and 10 minutes.
Comments