Economist “The truth is， insiders can do whatever they want in the stock market． “Uninformed individual shareholders are free fodder．”

It’s common sense.

Of course.

You could do whatever you wanted on Itadaki Street too.

Well then, we have no choice but to do indexing.

Whether someone is an insider or not is up to the authorities to decide, so they can do whatever they want.

There seem to be a ton of national civil servants doing this.

It’s a common saying that 90% of amateur investors in stocks end up losing money.

Recently, there was a culprit who used a Yahoo Finance message board to inflate stock prices.

Of course it is. With a country this corrupt, do you think they would be so honest as to protect other countries or any industry?

If the taxi driver happens to overhear a conversation between two customers, he’s safe because there’s no guarantee that the customer is an employee.

In the first place, it would be better to abandon the assumption that social rules are being followed in a healthy manner. Every industry, to a greater or lesser extent, violates established laws in order to generate profits.

Individual investors who are driven by hindsight and emotions cannot always win.

I got caught a few times. I was crying because it was going to drop so much, but the next day I got it cheaper. It was a big company.

As national elections approach, there are stocks that fluctuate wildly in order to raise funds for politicians’ election expenses.

This is not insider trading, but it is price inflation caused by spreading rumors.

ヒューマン・メタボローム・テクノロジーズ（株）株式に係る風説の流布に対する課徴金納付命令の決定について

www.fsa.go.jp

Jump@5ch

jump.5ch.net

That’s true.

This is no joke, seriously. If Yahoo leaks news about a company related to Justice’s relatives, you’d better sell within 3 months. The reason they leak the news is to maintain the stock price.

If it’s around 1 million yen, you won’t lose, but if it’s a crapshoot of tens of millions, you’ll probably panic just because you have an unrealized loss.

It’s obvious that if you trade stocks, you’ll see plenty of stock prices moving due to insider trading
and they’ll never be prosecuted
so whoever does the insider trading is the winner.

It is not a false claim that stocks are risky. So does that mean savings alone is enough?

I work in a position where I have insider interests, but the amount of investment an average office worker would make is not worth the risk of losing my job and being fined a huge amount, and even if I were able to invest a large amount, it still wouldn’t be worth it when I consider the possibility of losing my status and assets.

Those who trade stocks understand that the rules allow those with information and power to cheat as much as they want, right?