At a National Governors’ Conference, calls were raised that the national government should cover the loss of local revenue due to the revision of the annual salary cap. tbs news dig.
>>1 Tax cuts without discussing funding, like the Democratic Party for the People, will only lead to tax increases somewhere, and won’t reduce the burden on the people. What Tamaki said during the election was that the source of funds would be cuts in social security. Now that Tamaki has run away from the debate over cutting social security, those who voted for the Democratic Party for the People have been deceived by him. I can’t trust someone who has an affair (or can’t keep promises to his wife).
>>1 In the national financial statements for fiscal year 2021, tax and stamp revenues were about 64 trillion yen and social security-related expenses were about 55 trillion yen In other words, 86% of tax and stamp revenues were used for social security-related expenses. In Japan, one third of the population is over 65 years old and their livelihoods are supported by social security, and two people, including people with disabilities and minors, support the lives of one elderly person, so the burden on the working generation is increasing. What Japan needs is to cut social security spending, reduce taxes, and increase the disposable income of the working generation. By avoiding the discussion of cutting social security spending and only calling for tax cuts, Tamaki has deceived the people.
The only difference between being a private citizen and a governor is that most prefectural governors are the epitome of vested interests, since they are essentially government officials who have been transferred from the civil service to the prefectural government.
The reason why governors are shit is that they are threatening the people of their prefectures by holding hostage the things that should be their top priority, saying, “If tax revenues decrease, it will be the garbage trucks!” and “The operation of daycare centers and kindergartens!” There are probably other areas that should be cut first, like the esports promotion budget lol.
If we only listen to the opinions of local gang bosses who are screaming and yelling about something like the 1.03 million yen wall, a change of government would be impossible lol.
It’s crazy to try to prevent the citizens of the prefecture from increasing their income. If they had said this from the beginning, they would have been on the side of the citizens. But there are governors out there who have been exposed as idiots.
If governors across the country were to oppose removing the 1.03 million yen barrier, they would be seen as “prefectures that don’t want to raise the income of the younger generation,” so it would be difficult for them to oppose it.
The punch line is that with prices rising, most of the money, like handouts, ends up going into savings. That’s the kind of statistic that’s behind this.
Most of our taxes are taken from us through the external organizations and special corporations that civil servants retire to, so if we could eliminate all of those, we could eliminate the consumption tax.
Has everyone realized that illegal part-time jobs are more cost-effective and time-saving?
By this time next year, all police officers and SDF personnel will have lost their lives to illegal part-time jobs! Supporters of the LDP and Komeito are settling foreign terrorists in Japan so that they can attack all Japanese people with savings of over 10 million yen.
>>27 Rather than targeting high-risk places like police officers, illegal part-time jobs would target old people who live alone and have money saved up lol.
They say they’ll only agree if the government gives them money, and government money is tax money, too. In the end, what matters is whether their salaries are guaranteed, whether they’re guaranteed a job in the private sector, and whether local governments can continue to build useless buildings and hold as many events as they want despite the declining population. They don’t care about the residents.
People can be broadly divided into memory types and thinking types. Prices should be adjusted accordingly. That hasn’t happened yet. In other words, they’ve been collecting extra taxes up until now. Now they’re asking for the extra money. That’s a bit much.
This isn’t the first time that Japan has moved the deduction line; it has been revised many times in the past, and other countries have also adjusted it from time to time, but are there disputes like this everywhere? It feels strange, as if they’ve arbitrarily made it into a convenient, absolutely inviolable line.
If that’s the case, please provide a concrete plan for how to increase the income of the people if the income limit is not revised. These people really only think about tax revenue and don’t care about the lives of the people.
The reason he’s cutting his salary and retirement benefits is because he’s going to go into the private sector and live a leisurely life after his term as governor is over, and the important thing is how much he can get fat while he’s governor, so of course there’s nothing to be against.
The Lost 30 Years and the period when deductions were not reviewed are almost the same thing. Both the LDP and the Constitutional Democratic Party tried to cover it up by shouting “Wage increases! Wage increases!” but the Democratic Party for the People made a big advance and the majority finally found out.
>>57 We’ll raise local taxes We’ll raise service fees We’ll reduce services That’s the solution, and it’s the result you wanted, so you’re satisfied, right?
Comments