December 27, 2024 9:41pm Fuji TV updated their official website on the 27th. The company denied some reports that its employees were involved in the troubles involving women involving the talent Masahiro Nakai (52). A statement titled “Regarding reports about our employees in certain weekly magazines, etc.” was posted on the top page of the company’s information website. “The contents of the article contain untrue facts, and with regard to the dinner party mentioned in the article, the employee in question was not involved in any way, including in setting up the party,” the company wrote. Some reports also said that he had suddenly failed to attend a dinner party that had been set up by an employee of the station, creating a photo of Nakai and the woman together, but he said, “I was not even aware of the existence of the party, and it is not true that I suddenly failed to attend on the day. We have also communicated this to the publisher,” he said in strong terms. On the other hand, they continued, “We will once again honestly consider the state of our relationships with stakeholders, such as performers, and will make further efforts to comply with our company’s compliance guidelines,” and added, “Regarding this matter, there have been articles and posts on social media etc. that are based on speculation about our company’s employees and related parties. We cannot overlook any content that could lead to slander or libel, so please refrain from posting such content.” Previous thread.
If the back announcer was forced to do it and then the front announcer was put in and the station became inflamed with E. coli or something, even I would get sick.
It’s a matter of which side of the story more people will believe: the person who continued to employ Nakai, or the person who exposed Nakai’s sexual assault. If you want to overturn this, you’ll have to take it to court.
If Fuji’s story is true, Nakai must have used Fuji executive A’s name without permission, summoned Fuji staff, and done something that would have resulted in a settlement of 90 million yen. Shouldn’t Fuji TV be the one to file criminal charges against Nakai?
>>11 Whether Nakai will be so diligent himself will likely depend on who the blackfaced person at the meeting Ozawa set up was. This was before the Matsumoto article, so he probably had his minions do it.
Yesterday’s Nakai no Mado was the worst. It was sponsored by two companies. Fortnite and Money Doctor
Commercial companies and sponsors using Nakai Timee SoftBank Paytoku Saturday Club sponsor Bic Camera Sato Pharmaceutical Amazing News sponsor Daihatsu P&G Paloma Comtec Saran Wrap (Asahi Kasei Home Products) Suzuki Hitachi Building Systems Nitori Art Moving Center MC3 sponsor Doggyman KinSuma sponsor Nissin Foods Dareka to Nakai Kao Kinoshita Group Lion Paradise City Lifenet Insurance Earth Chemical Kirin Suntory.
>>14 I wonder if the original sponsors dropped out and the two companies from yesterday suddenly bought the slot at a low price? It’s pretty lame for a primetime special.
>>21 So I guess the higher-ups know better. If it was just the lower-ups, we could cut off the lizard’s tail and set up a third-party committee, but there’s a risk that more things that can’t be told will come out.
・The person mentioned in the story did not set it up. ・Someone else (someone involved in casting?) did it, but it was for their own personal gain and the company was not involved. If that’s the case, is there any contradiction between Fuji’s statement and the victim’s story?
They’re the kind of people who show a naked hellish scene on New Year’s Day. The producer is a Keio University graduate, and a female employee who also graduated from Keio University says there are other victims. The producer was promoted after the incident. If the TV station admitted to having been involved in human trafficking for years, they would be arrested, so they cut Nakai and brought the curtain down with a bang. It’s laughable how corrupt the entire organization is.
>>23 It would be one thing if he were arrested, but there’s a risk of being shut down, so it’s a big problem and there’s no choice but to completely deny it.
Apparently leaking information from the person himself involves confidentiality obligations and penalties, and Bunshun must be involved. Nakai’s lawyer is the one who leaked the 90 million yen. Fuji will deny it for now unless Nakai himself says it.
Previous thread None of the newspapers, including Shincho, which published the series of articles, have been able to obtain comments from the hostess who was allegedly the victim From the beginning, they have consistently only provided comments from the mama, photos of the mama, and the complaint the hostess filed against the mama.
Why was Fuji TV’s regular lawyer defending Nakai? He already had a relationship with Nakai, so if he took on the case as an extension of his usual duties then I wouldn’t have anything to say.
.
.
Comments