“Should we put the responsibility solely on Nakai Masahiro?” Fuji TV criticized for completely denying any involvement of station staff in woman trouble scandal. It looks like it’s going to be the worst New Year for Nakai Masahiro. An unprecedented scandal in which a settlement of 90 million yen was paid over a “serious problem” that occurred at a dinner party with a member of the entertainment industry, Ms. X. Mr. A, a Fuji Television executive, was originally scheduled to attend the dinner, but for some reason he canceled at the last minute. Something happened when Nakai and Ms. X were alone in the space. However, Fuji TV updated its official website and completely denied the previous reports. The text reads, “Regarding the dinner party mentioned in the article, the employee in question was not involved in any way, including setting up the party. “I was not even aware of the existence of the meeting, nor did I suddenly disappear on the day,” the statement read. It is said that Ms. X was originally invited by Mr. A, who told her that he was going to have dinner with Mr. Nakai. However, Fuji’s latest explanation was that Mr. A had absolutely no involvement in Nakai and Ms. X’s dinner party. In other words, the “serious trouble” is being framed as something that happened when Nakai and X-san were having a private meal together, and Fuji is instead acting like a “victim” who was at the mercy of X-san’s “lies.” Fuji TV’s assertion is weak This one-sided explanation has generated comments like the following on the internet: “Well then Fuji TV has to sue Bunshun!” “Are they going to put the blame solely on Nakai?” “Does this mean the victim went out to eat alone with Nakai?” “Are they just going to blame Nakai and dismiss the whole thing?” The majority of comments are criticising Fuji for trying to avoid responsibility. One production company staff member has raised doubts about Fuji’s explanation this time. “If that is the case, Fuji TV must sue Ms. X for defamation as soon as possible in order to restore the honor of the executive. This is a crime of intentionally spreading false information to unspecified people, thereby damaging one’s credibility and social standing. However, this time Fuji merely denied the allegations on its website, asking readers to “refrain from posting any content that could lead to slander or defamation, as we cannot tolerate such content,” and for some reason their argument is weak. It’s inevitable that people will think they have some kind of weakness.” And another thing, if it turns out to be a false explanation, Fuji TV will be at a considerable disadvantage. “The explanation that A had no involvement whatsoever in the dinner party between X-san and Nakai is actually incredibly frightening. There would be no problem if Fuji’s explanation were true at face value, but if it is false, it would be an outrageous attempt by the TV station to manipulate public opinion by making Nakai out to be the bad guy and denigrating him. SMAP is a group that has contributed to Fuji TV’s triple crown in viewership ratings with programs such as “SMAP x SMAP.” Even though Fuji TV has benefited from this, it is inevitable that they will be seen as a TV station that will betray Nakai without any hesitation.” (Production company staff member) So who is lying?
>>1 ■Companies and sponsors of commercials featuring Nakai Timee Softbank’s Paytoku (deleted) ■Saturday Club sponsors Bic Camera, Sato Pharmaceutical ■Amazing News sponsors Daihatsu, P&G, Paloma, Comtec Saran Wrap (Asahi Kasei Home Products) Suzuki, Hitachi Building Systems, Nitori Art Moving Center ■MC3 sponsors P&G, Doggyman ■KinSuma sponsors P&G, Nitori, Nissin Foods ■Dareka to Nakai Kao, Kinoshita Group Lion, Paradise City, Lifenet Life Earth Pharmaceutical, Kirin, Suntory ■Nakai’s Window Revival Special (12/27) Fortnite and Money Doctor are providing the first 39 minutes only. ■Entertainment All-Star Amateur Baseball (12/30) Lifenet Insurance, Lotte, Kowa, Choya Yodobashi Camera, Suntory Wellness.
Nakai Masahiro pays 90 million yen in settlement money for a serious woman trouble, and the background to the cancellation of two programs★2 (12.20 [ >>1 ] >Is Kimutaku the only former SMAP member who is innocent after all?>Kimura Takuya is too saintly He knows a lot and just lets it go, so he’s basically guilty or complicit Sanma, other Yoshimoto comedians, Kusunagi, Tamori, Takeshi, Sonomanma, Masuzoe, Hashige, Izumi Fusao, etc. continued) 12.27 In terms of the impact on TV stations and the entertainment industry, it’s not just Nakai who is to blame, but all the old people involved in Yoshimoto, Johnny’s, and the entertainment, broadcasting, and political industries.
The only way Nakai can turn things around is to file a countersuit against Fuji TV’s Nakajima producer and Matsumoto Hitoshi for compensation. He’ll turn it into a ruthless fight and blame Nakajima and Matsumoto. I’m also a victim because I couldn’t refuse Matsumoto and Nakajima’s sex tribute system. This is the plan. Normally, this is a counterattack that the pimp Ozawa could do, but he’s a weakling who keeps silent for fear of being killed by Matsumoto. However, Nakai is a big celebrity, so he’s not going to get involved with Matsumoto. He can just shift the blame to Nakajima and say he was deceived. He can get material for his retaliation from his mahjong buddy Ozawa. Ozawa can leak Matsumoto and Nakajima P’s crimes and wrongdoings. And Nakai can tweet “It’s finally out,” and he’ll win for sure lol. That way Nakai and Ozawa can survive in the entertainment industry with just a skin in the gut, and the way to come back will be open. Matsumoto, Downtown, Yoshimoto Kogyo, and Fuji TV are all over anyway, so he can deal them the final blow and get the public on his side.
The victim has a confidentiality agreement with Nakai, but there is probably no confidentiality agreement with Fuji TV, so I think it will just come out in the open.
Listen to the song Kirakira Hikaru, an insert song from the drama, “Nani wa yananu hito” (People Who Say Nothing). It’s exactly like “Shape of My Heart.” There’s no point in expecting morality from a station that does such shameless things.
Is the person who wrote this article an idiot? Even if it’s true that Fuji TV wasn’t involved, the biggest problem is that they knew that their employees had been harmed, but they continued to favor Nakai.
>>32 In the first place, it was a mistake to treat the Johnny’s issue as just a problem of Johnny Kitagawa’s sexual assault. The fact that the media has been too lenient in reporting on the scandals of Johnny’s talents should also have been an issue.
Nakajima was like a puppet of Ninety Nine on Mechaike. He had some strong lines to say to the other actors, but it felt like he was being forced to say them like a bullied kid.
All I want to know is what Nakai did to the other person. That’s all I need to know. Isn’t there a reporter who will risk his life to investigate this 90 million yen scam? I wish Nashimoto was still alive.
The Nakai-Ozawa coalition should launch an all-out attack on Matsumoto and Nakajima. They should say that they too have been deceived by Matsumoto and Nakajima and bring about an interesting battle. Matsumoto has already been practically banned from the entertainment industry, so his comments blaming him and Nakajima should be made public along with the evidence submitted by the pimp Ozawa. Then the public can support Nakai and Ozawa and turn the tide. Nakai, Ozawa, are you watching? You two should have a strategy meeting right away.
Generally speaking, who made the restaurant reservations? Did Nakai make the reservations himself and tell the woman? “I’m going to have dinner with everyone from the station.”
Comments